Value Factor Timing
Should one time his Value Investing? What gives Value its value?
Benjamin Graham published his first book on Value Investing in 1934. This gave objective criteria for judging price based on stock being a share of a business. Using this, a business can be valued based on the future value of its earnings, rather than the animal spirits of other investors.
Astronomical Comput of Strassbourg, Image Credit: Wikicommons
Warren Buffet is the most famous example of a successful value stock picker, but it eminently is hard to distinguish skill from luck amongst younger pickers, and the older picker's capital base is usually self-admitedly too large after many decades compounding. To create one's luck, there are statistical anomalies that more quantitative buffs such as AQR, O Shaugnessy, Meb Faber, and Alpha Architect seek to exploit since the 90s by creating value and momentum factor ETF. They look at statistical factor performance independent of timing, and growth differential is not taken into account for the simplest approaches, except for GARP (Growth At Reasonable Price approaches). Style timing has been researched but the evidence from 2000 was not compelling.
AQR has been vocal on the underperformance of value during the covid crisis. See their article here. One would imagine then that the underperformance is mostly based on valuation multiple compression, but it is a question one can assess numerically, how did the fundamentals evolve and how much cheaper is value after 10Y of price underperformance?
After the analysis below, it appears to me that based on past performance, value stocks delivered much slower growth than the SP500, and there is no fundamental reason to call value a screaming bargain here. Growth was sold at a reasonable price. Still, based on the study below, it appears that VVAL and 2805 HK are less risky than SP500.
Disclosure: I own those two ETF.
Canaries in the Coal Mine
Factor analysis can be complicated, I will just use Vanguard ETFs. Here is my smart but rather arbitrary selection of Vanguard ETF:
- VVAL is a international developed value ETF
- 3085 HK is a Hong Kong traded high dividend Asia ex Japan ETF
- VUSA is a SP500 ETF domiciled in Ireland
- 2805 HK is a Hong Kong traded pan-asia ex developed (Japan/Australia/NZ) ETF
- VT is a global ETF traded in NY.
Growth Adjusted Earning Yield as Simple Valuation Metrics:
Vanguard publishes a consistent set of metrics on its ETF. The inverse of the P/E is the earning yield. For relative value, earning yield needs to be added to the expected future growth to obtain a all-in-one growth adjusted earning yield number.
Past growth may not continue forever, so if future growth is expected to be 0 or the same for all ETF, we should just compare earning yields. If we use past growth or half-past growth as a predictor of future growth, we get different valuation metrics.
|Ticker||VVAL||3085 HK||2805 HK||VUSA||VT|
|median mkt cap||6.2bn||170bn||242bn||137.2bn||50.7bn|
|Yield + 1/2 Growth||13.5%||13.6%||13.1%||11.3%||11.4%|
|Yield + Growth||16.6%||16.0%||19.2%||18.3%||17.5%|
source: Vanguard and Own computation
The valuation multiple compression we have seen for value stocks appears justified given the much lower past earning growth of value stocks compared to the SP500. There is no screaming bargain, just protracted underperformance.
September Update: More Vanguard ETFs
|Description||Ticker||Earning Yield||Yield + 1/2 Growth||Yield + Growth|
|eur ex uk||VERE||5.9%||10.0%||14.0%|
|total china||3169 HK||6.3%||16.7%||27.1%|
|apac dividend||3085 HK||11.1%||13.6%||16.0%|